Sweden - From harm reduction to prohibition and back? Ted Goldberg
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 |
Posted by
Mark
|
See attached poster
Sweden – From harm reduction to prohibition and back?
Presentation and discussion by Ted Goldberg
When: March 22nd 2010: 1:00 – 4:00 PM
Where: Pacific Spirit Community Health Centre – 2110 W 43rd Ave. (at West Boulevard); Room 104
Cost: Free
Registration: No registration is required – but come early as seating is limited.
In 1922 Sweden held one of the few national referendums in its history to decide if the country should follow in the footsteps of the U.S. and forbid alcohol. Prohibition was rejected by a very slight majority of the voters. The country decided that we could live with alcohol, but that policies must be devised to minimize harm. Some of the primary measures decided upon and the principles upon which they are based will be presented. To what extent are these principles relevant for drug policy in modern industrial societies?
In the 1960’s when problematic use of illicit substances rapidly increased in marginalized segments of the population, and recreational use became commonplace among middle class youth, most western societies grappled with the problem of devising measures to deal with these new contingencies. As opposed to alcohol, Sweden decided that it couldn’t live with these drugs and zero-tolerance became the basis of policy. Why did the country now choose Prohibition?
For decades Sweden was one of the staunchest defenders of Prohibition in Europe. Upon joining the European Union in 1995 Sweden took every opportunity to promote “the Swedish model”. However, without officially proclaiming a reorientation of illicit drug policy, a number of harm reduction measures have been instituted since the turn of the millennium. And in 2009, when Sweden held the chairmanship of the European Union, and therefore had a major opportunity to set the agenda, illicit drug policy was hardly mentioned. What might this imply concerning future drug policy?
After presenting these themes there will be an opportunity to discuss the extent to which Swedish experiences are relevant for Canada and Vancouver today.
Ted Goldberg, Ph.D., is Professor of Sociology at the Univ. of Gävle, and Associate Professor of Social Work at Stockholm Univ. He has been doing research on people who use illicit substances and on drug policy for more than 40 years and is the author of numerous books and articles on these subjects. Over a period of 4½ years he did participant observation research on the major drug scene in Stockholm. He has developed a labeling theory model to explain both how people become problematic users and why it is so difficult to get off drugs. Ted Goldberg is also an active participant in the drug debate in Sweden.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Mark Haden
Mark Haden currently works for Vancouver Coastal Health, Addiction Services, and has worked in detox, methadone and outpatient settings in both counseling and supervisory roles for over 20 years. Mark is a pivotal voice in the drug policy reform movement, providing viable, coherent models for reforming drug education and regulating markets for currently illegal substances.
Mark's listserv has become an invaluable hub of information about drug policy and reform efforts. This blog will serve as an archive for future mailings.
Mark's listserv has become an invaluable hub of information about drug policy and reform efforts. This blog will serve as an archive for future mailings.
Visit Mark's personal website here: www.MarkHaden.com
Archive
-
▼
2010
(507)
-
▼
February
(37)
- Cafe Scientifique (Vancouver & Kelowna) - Let's Ta...
- US/UN: In drug war, failed old ideas never die
- The INCB criticizes several Latin American countries
- Psychedelic Science in the 21st Century
- UN watchdog takes aim at Canada's medical marijuan...
- Conservative attack ads and anti-drug war are wear...
- Latin America undermining drug war by decriminaliz...
- IDPC February Alert
- INCB Interferes with Countries' Sovereignty
- FW: March 4th book launch
- Pelletier: Provinces must pay attention to Insite ...
- First free heroin clinic opens in Denmark
- Olympics Puts Spotlight on Vancouver's Liberal Dru...
- in the news
- Time to prohibit drugs prohibition
- in the news
- Harm reduction resource list - feb 2010
- New Research on Street-Involved Youth in Vancouver
- in the news
- Attention Ottawa: Insite is a health care service...
- in the news
- in the news
- Federal government to take supervised injection si...
- Modernising New Zealand's drug law
- Drug law proposals set to be rejected
- in the news
- Pivot's free legal services during the games
- Conservatives Ignore the Law and Science to Try to...
- Ottawa goes to court to kill B.C.'s safe-injection...
- Sweden - From harm reduction to prohibition and ba...
- CBC -- Ottawa to appeal injection site ruling
- The Vancouver Experiment - Does it work?
- Insite-The Vancouver Experiment
- in the news
- FW: Keeping the Door Open: SAFEGAMES 2010 Volunt...
- Tories hold science in contempt
- Under the Skin: A People's Case for Prison Needle ...
-
▼
February
(37)
Drug Policy Resources
- BC Center for Excellence in HIV/AIDS
- Canada Headlines
- Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy
- Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network
- Canadian Media Awareness Project
- Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy
- Common Sense for Drug Policy
- DRCN Drug Library
- Drug Policy Alliance
- Drug Sense
- Educators for Sensible Drug Policy
- Human Rights and the Drug War
- Institute for Policy Studies - Drug Policy
- Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
- Marijauan Policy Project
- Media Awareness Project
- Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
- National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
- Students for Sensible Drug Policy
- Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users
- Vancouver Coastal Health
- Why Prohibition
- Youth Rise
0 comments:
Post a Comment